For the reasons previously mentioned.The closing attorney did not answer the question I had about what to do if an investor buys using Subject To, sells on a wrap and there is no equity (as you rightfully say, the current crop of investors believe to be okay to do) We shall see as they fail, in Subject To's that are bought over leveraged, or sold on wraps, what course of action the investors will attempt, in order to try to avoid the DOS and what response the regulators will have.

I agree with the mortgage payment metaphor, although it's not exactly the same circumstances, so that's why I'm not 100% settled on course of action.2.

@David Flores that's great news!

Good news is office buildings are very inexpensive to insure.

People would want to continue to educate but not take action.

There's a lot of preparation, a ton of patience and when it's time to strike, very little room for error and a lot of action all at once! 

Good news is that once you get traction you will be able to hire a VA to make the initial calls for you so you focus only on the hand raisers.

Only taking action if the deal has fat projections, meaning the seller has lost his mind and wants to sell for a ridiculously low price.  

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state.

In my view, the only reported behavior that could lead to your action is the driving too fast if it rises to the level of a lease or law violation, but you should investigate to get facts that could prove the allegation before taking any corrective action against that tenant.