When your documentation is thorough and all procedures are correctly followed, you can typically achieve a favorable outcome in having the tenants removed.I've done it many times with out the need for an attorney. 

Procedural errors will now be catastrophically expensive.What's going to happen is that many landlords and nearly all tenants won't know about the changes, so only a few landlords will get burned at first, and that amount will grow over time.

You can do it on your 2023 tax return though, with a complex procedure involving Form 3115.

@Kevin Sobilo, is generally correct in what he mentioned, however, there are a few revenue procedures that could allow for a split allocation of investment & primary portions of each where we could still discuss an exchange. 

As I understand it, HB24-1098 changes the procedures for evictions and creates many more procedural hurdles but I would not say it "restricts a landlords ability to evict non-paying tenants".

Check with your local Real Estate Association, get an equity line against your house, pay friends and family an interest rate for their cash investment, etc.TAX SALE PROCEDURES - South CarolinaTaxes, Penalties and RolloverAll taxes are due and payable between the thirtieth day of September and the fifteenth day of January after their assessment in each year.

(e.g. condition, location, size)2) The marketing / sales procedures are inadequate (e.g. no advertising, unresponsive manager)3) The asking rent is too highThe reasons a house won't sell quickly are similar.  

I suggest you let the settlement agent know about the letter and submit a claim to your title insurer using the procedure listed in your policy. 

A better approach might be to follow proper procedures to address the AC issue and potentially evict for breach of lease later if necessary.

One of the principal industry concerns about the vast power granted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was that these powers were too insulated from review….The ruling sends a crystal-clear message to federal agencies that their powers are not unlimited…We would not be at this point today if government agencies were more prudent and consistent about staying within their statutory authorities, grounding their rulemakings in empirical facts, and heeding appropriate procedural safeguards…Instead, too frequently, our regulators appear to be chasing headlines and short-term political wins.”National Association of Homebuilders - “Today’s Supreme Court ruling is an important step forward to advance meaningful regulatory reform because it means that federal agencies can no longer continuously change the law – and the intent of Congress – by implementing their own interpretation of statutes as long as the interpretation is viewed as being ‘reasonable.’