Its always good to have plan A, B and C as an investor as you never know what can change your scenario at the last minute.

We focus mainly on value add properties in A/B areas.

We could work backwards from the condo's upper tier pricing (that you would likely get into contract at) and backwards calculate how much income you're going to need to qualify given the probability of how the rest of your rental income and liabilities will be caluclated.We do these calculations (plan A, B, C, etc) on a daily basis.

The hassle factor of a A-B class tenant vs C-D is drastically different.

Aiming to get a C property, in a B neighborhood, to attract the best of the worst in terms of clients to capture stability of section 8.The biggest thing I'm stuck on is knowing who to trust. 

If it’s not in the case records, then it’s a BS claim against you.If it is in the case record, the form should say to whom it was addressed.

personally im not a fan of sub2 (unpopular opinion on BP, sorry ab it). most don't understand what they're getting into with sub2 and thats where it becomes problematic. 

Most other CRMs are all about the A-B only, and don't do much with the property after the B-C has closed.

A/B properties but the benefits are tangible. 

It’s been so annoying I’m in the process of diversifying into A/B+ neighborhoods now.