A 'homeless' person is now called 'unhoused'.

The odds are pulling money from a HELOC is actually more expensive than leveraging more on the new home (less than 20% down). 

@Roshan K. a homeless person is financially free.

San Francisco though seems to be pretty volatile, especially because many companies are moving out of the city to South Bay due to the ongoing homelessness crisis in the city.

Eviction would likely render the individual homeless— or force the individual to move into and live in close quarters in a new congregate or shared living setting— because the individual has no other available housing options.It does not apply to evictions for things other than non-payment of rent, and it does not prevent charging late fees. 

Some reprimands after 32 warnings, a temporary suspension, but kick out to the street making them homeless?

She literally thought I was homeless and she gave me the $2.

Homelessness 3 times , lived in bad neighborhoods where people got shot , generator in the backyard for electricity , graduated high-school and did a little bit of college .

They created a master planed 51 acre community to help people the chronically homeless.

If they don't pay and are staying it's a criminal offense, you call the cops, they haul the deadbeat away.But cities obviously don't want these deadbeats roaming the city home less, so that's why even in landlord friendly areas, it takes a month or two from the time they stop paying to get them out of the home, all while the landlord eats the cost of that.But it get ridiculous in these liberal areas.