
12 October 2009 | 61 replies
This was smart and is, for reasons I don't understand, an underplayed bipartisan victory by his administration.2.
6 November 2009 | 14 replies
Some shareholders are upset about the merger last year and bonuses that were paid around the time of the merger without sufficient information to shareholders.

8 November 2009 | 4 replies
If you don't upset him, then you're offering too much.3) Leave the tenants in place.

6 August 2012 | 30 replies
Clearly, you skipped day 2.Unfortunately, your planned backfired -- by coming here as an OBVIOUS shill, you took a thread that didn't have anything bad to say about the product you're trying to pitch and just completely stripped the product and its creator of any small amount of value and integrity that might have been left.If I were the guy who created this product and sent you here to pitch it, I'd be very upset with your performance (and if you ARE the guy who created it posing as someone else, I suggest hiring a real marketing team).

18 March 2011 | 8 replies
I went from 9.5% to 7.5% so I wasn't too upset about the nickel and dime fees.

3 June 2010 | 11 replies
Maybe he won't be upset if we keep him as the maintenance man.

19 December 2010 | 33 replies
This is very valuable info so we won't make people upset or look like total amateurs

8 January 2011 | 75 replies
We have a great thread going and someone gets upset about something and bring crap up from other threads to fulfill a personal agenda instead of addressing the OP.Dumb...

28 June 2010 | 22 replies
Congrats on your victories Nick (and Jason) . . . in the end, those douchebags will get theirs.

24 June 2010 | 7 replies
Very upset, and probably going to walk away from the deal on principle.