
11 November 2016 | 20 replies
If they now say that it was only for walk traffic, then they/you should maybe also check with ADA, because that would mean that they are now punishing someone for being handicapped in a way.

12 April 2016 | 12 replies
Thus, where a policy or practice that restricts access to housing on the basis of criminal history has a disparate impact on individuals of a particular race, national origin, or other protected class, such policy or practice is unlawful under the Fair Housing Act if it is not necessary to serve a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest of the housing provider, or if such interest could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.

17 June 2012 | 19 replies
Patti: In CA, fee waivers from the courts are available so you can go forward with your unlawful detainer (30 day).

7 September 2012 | 52 replies
She said if I decide to go for unlawful detainer lawsuit eviction then in her own words, she is going to win and I will be paying $400/hour fees for her.
16 May 2019 | 28 replies
What fines/punishment could they face that would make them desire to sell fast and avoid fines?

13 September 2012 | 22 replies
The saddest thing of all, is that uncle sam will probably turn a blind eye to it, as it would be punishing people on the majority side of the class warfare argument.

1 December 2013 | 51 replies
Me: [Already seeing this in the unlawful detainer book printed by our county rental association - his name listed seven times in less than one year.]

1 July 2013 | 9 replies
This is loan fraud and is punishable with a major fine and possible jail time.

23 June 2017 | 2 replies
“Drug-related illegal activity” means the illegal manufacture, sale, distribution, purchase, USE, or possession with intent to manufacture, sell distribute, or USE of a controlled substance (as defined in Section 102 or the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 8002) or possession of drug paraphernalia.2.Resident, any member of the resident’s household or guest or other person under the resident’s control shall not engage in any act intended to facilitate illegal activity, including drug-related illegal activity, on or near the said premises.3.Resident or members of the household will not permit the dwelling to be used for, or to facilitate illegal activity, including drug-related illegal activity, regardless of whether the individual engaging in such activity is a member of the household.4.Resident or members of the household will not engage in the manufacture, sale or distribution of illegal drugs at any locations, whether on or near the dwelling unit premises, or otherwise.5.Resident, any members of the resident’s household, or a guest or other person under the resident’s control shall not engage in acts of violence, or threats of violence, including but not limited to the unlawful discharge of firearms, prostitution, criminal street gang activity, intimidation, or any other breach of the housing agreement that the other wise jeopardizes the health safety or welfare of the landlord, his agents, or tenants.6.VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE PROVISIONS SHALL BE A MATERIAL VIOLATION OF THE HOUSING AGREEMENT AND GOOD CAUSE FOR TEMINATION OF TENANCY.

20 May 2017 | 13 replies
There is a big push right now from one of Philadelphia's newly elected councilwomen to identify and punish slum lords.