Unfortunately, all title companies are demanding more and more documentation, especially when dealing with entities on title, but that is just the nature of the business due to all the fraudulent transfers.

Yes, or you might as well just gamble your money on the stock market.

Tenant chose to lie and sign the lease fraudulently. 

A technically build-able in CA is still an expensive gamble.

A good quality structure built by a Master Builder will stand the test of time, vs. a scrap of paper, or an entry in a data base, based on how much the next person will pay for it.You can add value to structure and collect rents even in the bad times.Where people run into trouble is when they borrow too heavily, and the bank takes the "Still Valuable" asset from them.With a stock, it's a roulette wheel gamble, as to how much it will be worth at any given time. 

You are basically gambling your business on a stranger.

Once they made that decision to sue you  they will (1) only remember events in the way their attorney suggests is to their advantage; (2) swear they never signed the documents you produce; if the documents are notarized insist that the notary must be fraudulent; if the notary is brought in to testify swear you  (a) hypnotized them or (b) brainwashed them and they’re not responsible.  

Gambling with someone else's mortgage is not something to mess around with. 

My rational is this:As a REI, I am very comfortable gambling on the future, after all, it's what you do.

I countered sued for fraudulent inducement, and to void the contract.