The sell that  non-profit agencies do is that there is on-going support for these recipients to improve their credit.

Even with the recently improved ADU regulations, for most house hackers it still a long process that could leave them with a unit that is not legal.

If so, has this been effective with improving efficiency, tenant satisfaction, and overall business operations?

The plan is to come in and improve the NOI over the next 12-24 months then implement a strategic cash out refinance and move to long term permanent agency debt.

Here are three creative financing solutions to offset of improve investment attractiveness and returns:- Assumable mortgages.

We do have our account reconciliations audited by a 3rd party quarterly, which helps catch errors before they impact our clients.Highly recommend any owner dealing with a PMC discuss with their PMC and their tax professional, or an expert like @Sean O'Keefe, about how to improve processes and communications to make this process smoother:)

We have seen an improvement in March in sales and slightly in inventory. 

These would also not take too much time except for my partner and I both still working full time jobs in addition to managing real estate so we are open to various ideas that might improve our efficiency.

I then **Rehabbed** it, making necessary repairs and improvements to increase its value.

I have been digging through the guidance and am wondering if anyone has ever taken advantage of the following clause regarding 203k improvement types from the HUD SFH Handbook 4000.1, pg 374:- "reconstructing a Structure that has been or will be demolished, provided the complete existing foundation system is not affected and will still be used;"- "repairing, reconstructing or elevating an existing foundation where the Structure will not be demolished;"Guidance link: https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/4000.1hsgh.pdfHas anyone ever built a new home on top of an existing foundation using a 203k loan?