I have a duplex in a very trendy and fast growing area on the west side of Cleveland (Gordon Square).

Good to see this trend is also going towards one bedroom places. 

It is pretty trendy after all.

No amenity that is easy to install is going to lure a potential tenant, no matter how trendy it is.

I grew up in GR area and it seems overly trendy and too hot.

If there is one trend I see, it's that people take for granted what they are used to before it gets automated out of existence.

I looked at New London and think it's a fantastic town, probably going to see increases in value IMHO: its got great "bones" as a city, is starting to "urbanify" (trendy places starting to open) but it's way behind the curve, and it seems to me the hipsters there are still young and haven't started having kids/figuring out how to make the city work with kids--so prices are dirt cheap.

I think Bergen and Hudson are trendy and growing neighborhoods but that goes along with height price per unit and pretty low cash on cash return. 

Lake Street (old money), Laurel Heights (near USF campus), Forest Hill and extension with great views, West Portal (muni station, some big lots), St Francis Woods (old money, huge lots), Merced Manor near Lake Merced, and Inner Sunset (demand from UCSF will always be there), Golden Gate Heights (great views), Noe Valley (trendy).

In the Denver area the trend is for the larger municipalities ie Denver and Aurora to limit STR to primary residences or stays or 30 days or longer.