I'd like for investor 1 (the key employee) and investor 2 (the experienced business owner) to invest $112,500 for 15% ownership, and I'd like to further buy in with $75,000 of my own money to add 10% to my shares, giving us this ratio:-Me: 60% ownership (additional $75,000 invested for additional 10% stake)-Key Employee: 15% ownership ($112,500 invested)-Business Owner/Mentor: 15% ownership ($112,500 invested)-Original (other) partner: 10% ownership (paid out $325,000) I would be happy with any variation of the above numbers that leaves me 100% in charge, and owning more than half of the company.

You, or your agent, should then review the estoppels with the respective tenants; record any missing information or variation to the information presented {this is how you find side deals or catch un-ethical vendors}; and have the tenants attest the estoppel (i.e. sign with a witness).If the attested estoppels differ from the information provided by the Vendor, you go back to Vendor to work why.

., one slight variation.

There are so many variations that can lead to a successful direct marketing campaign.

The variation is deals will out weigh the variations in those markets unless you plan on buying a huge number of properties.

Of course there can be many variations, but that's the division I make, and read often on the boards here.

Some of my most profitable deals long term have been 0.75% deals and some of my least profitable ones have been 2% deals, and much variation in between ... so, to me at best it is a meaningless metric, at worst it is the opposite in that it has in my experience been slightly inverse to the profitability.

A real variation of strategies, ages, experiences etc.

Some people are saying online that there is a lot of variation within the neighborhoods.

While there are many variations in markets, my experience has been that removing a bedroom drops the value of a property.