I really do think it could be done in cities where the hotel prices are significantly higher than the vacation rental prices, which signals a mismatch between supply and demand. 

The issues is the bad sensor will cause the other detectors to start sounding since they are hardwired (the third wire going to the hardwired smoke detectors is used to signal all connected detectors to go off). 

Could a RE tease out some signal through the noise in the national builders stock price to arrive at a conclusion about their investments?

That's exactly the type of answer I was hoping for -- I got sort of mixed signals from you when you posted in my thread in the "Make Deals, Find Partners, Mentors & BirdDogs, etc." forum and this one.

To me that signals either 1. the sponsor lacks the attention to detail to ensure the document they use to generate investors is error free or 2. they are massaging the numbers/running two models to tell investors what they want to hear. 

Hey @Guy Heath - Thanks for the head's up . . . just drag those messages to your inbox and it should signal to Gmail that we're legit.

I told him that I do not want us to be the caused of any delay because we are all aware that it will take a good 12 weeks before Council releases the go ahead signal to build.

This mean either by phone, email, text and even smoke signals if it means you've got open and constant communication with your negotiator.

That should send a signal to tenants 2 & 3 that are running late.

@Bill Briggs – not surprised…..I’m sure Gary was probably piloting a plane to China and got some type of signal from the clouds that he really needed to put a review on BP (good timing) although he’s not a user of BP.