You want to make it a deterrent, but not punishment.

Can this be a problem when I fill UD-100 (unlawful detainer), as 6 d and 6 e mentions rent changes, addendums?

Sounds like that landlord needs a smack down but it isn't fair to punish everyone.

By law, under the Fair Housing Act, it is: ". . .unlawful to refuse to make reasonable accommodations to rules, policies, practices, or services when such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.

The world of equities and other intangible investments require significantly greater use of brain vs. brawn, and reward (and punish) people regardless of gender. 

Refundable, so if they’re good tenants they get rewarded on the end, and if not, they in essence get punished as I cover my costs more realistically after move out.

While you can't punish them for breaking the lease, you can work with them to minimize vacancy.

Thats just gluttony for punishment imo :). 

If you are a 'do-gooder' type of person, you may feel like this is punishing them.

Third, since you and your people want to be okay with theft of healthcare from the emergency room (not requiring people to have health insurance and not fining them when they don't), I prefer the federal government to step in and hold you and your people accountable by taxing you to subsidize your unlawful actions in the interest of protecting my and my country's financial security.