@Jon Schwartz  Actually, I still don't at all agree with your interpretations of this proposition's text. 

Some of this is subject to interpretation.

. §§ 55.1-1204, 55.1-1253 (2020)The gist I've gathered is it's up to me, whether I'll accept partial or not, but I wanted to gather some input from the wonderful BP community to see I'm interpreting it correctly or not.Unfortunately, there's nothing exact in my current lease and this is a first for me.

So plan ahead for that.The only other issue is that if the refinance is too close to the sale (not definitive time line but say within the same year as the sale) the IRS could interpret that as an attempt to access gain by using the refinance prior to a 1031. 

What consumers many times have problems with is the interpretation of that data.

They have about five strategies, with general Class B and Class A multifamily being one.I looked them up on the BBB for the city in which they are based, and they get a "C" rating and have 60 negative reviews.How would you interpret that? 

The insurer denied coverage on several grounds, including an exclusion providing that the policy did not apply to any claim arising out of “the commingling, improper use, theft, stealing, conversion, embezzlement or misappropriation of funds or accounts.”In the ensuing coverage action, the agent argued that the exclusion must be interpreted to reach only conduct by the insured, and that because the terms “theft,” “stealing,” “misappropriation,” and “conversion” could be interpreted to include conduct by both the insured and third parties, the exclusion was ambiguous and rendered coverage illusory.The court disagreed and determined that the exclusion broadly encompassed conduct by the insured or a third party.

@Bobby Pagliarini I've struggled a bit with how to reply to this.I guess this is because I'm interpreting the question as, "I don't see numbers out there that look good, but how do I keep buying and expanding anyway?"

Requirements and rule interpretations are evolving daily.

I might have the interpretation of the code wrong.