Then you only have to wrestle with the moral dilemma.TJ

It wasn't an issue of illegality, just an ethical or moral question for the attorney. 

Then comes the morality of kicking someone out who's wife is pregnant in the middle of the dead NJ winter.

I guess the moral of the story is...

I realize I wouldn't be financially responsible but moral responsibility is important to me as well. 

LOLnow I get it on vacant ghetto dogs. who cares If close or not.. but when you start to doing this and fibbing to homeowners who are counting on you may want to check your moral compass ... :))) OH God what has the internet done unleashed this attitude..

Moral of the story: where there's a will...Please keep sending recommendations!

They really don't have a legal or moral choice.Tenant needs to give them written permission to share their information if not a 30 day notice.

Escrow accounts are supposed to be regularly audited, obviously a method was found to delay the audits until all the units in the subdivision were sold.Not only were they quoting ~$500 less than everyone else because of the above, they were likely qualifying everyone with PITI being ~$500 less, meaning they'd approve you when no other lender would.There were obviously some behind the scenes meetings going on.I personally don't take part in the 'builder's preferred in house lender' scheme... too many moral hazards. 

My original agent called that a "moral hazard" because it would tempt people to try to collect.