You can bet they do quality work or these huge companies would not be hiring them. 

For me I would rather have fewer high quality properties (Class A and B) than more less expensive properties (Class C). 

Just be sure to do your best to compare apples-to-apples, not just with beds/baths/sq ft, but also quality of finishes.Then present this info to the tenant and ask them what they think a fair increase is.Strategy is to show them they can't find anything else at the rate they are paying.Of course, at least 25% of the time they will claim they can't afford any increase.

It is easy to find your comps there for quality and pricing.Until an agreement is signed, communication is solely through FF.

Quality vs quantity.Good idea.

This is true whether those clients were on the optional recordkeeping program or not.I don't have a lot of details and am not personally involved in this program, but I have experience with SEPiraK separately and they are a quality operation.You can reach out to info at sepirak com to learn more.

We ask them to provide an air quality test done by a licensed company IF we do not see visual evidence. 

Seems to me that at scale, a portfolio like Luka's would indeed build wealth over time and open up options to transition into higher quality appreciation markets several years down the line, with the benefit of more capital and (more importantly) more experience.

That is where a good GC comes in, we are quality men and whistle blowers for the customer.

Some have quotas, some don't.Like anything in real estate the gatekeepers of the knowledge are the people in the market on a daily basis. also greatly depends on the velocity in the market place the price points quality .. etc etc.. tons of factors for builders to consider when negotiating with buyers and or the buyers agent.