I'm open to accepting lower pay in return for valuable learning experiences.

I’ve had very good luck keeping my rates lower through a small company than quotes I received from the big name insurance companies.

So I've been looking at this LIHTC stuff for a few years on and off. It always seemed like a huge headache and probably not meant for a little fish investor like myself.  That being said, I think there might be an opp...

Those rent increases have pushed some lower-income tenants to the brink of what they can afford.

The investor's theory behind his suggestion was to use the 500k loan to wipe all debt and only pay on the new loan, I'm not sure if this would be advantageous financially due to my current debts monthly payments set at: LTR = 1900MTR = 1500HELOC= 550Vehicle = 850Total = 4800 monthly At current loan rates for 500k, and a 800+ credit score be a lower monthly than the $4800? 

The problem is that people will never know that they sold their home for $30k to $50k lower than what they could have gotten. 

Believe it or not, I’ve seen many investor ads targeting these keywords, which have NOTHING TO DO WITH SELLERS.Targeting the wrong audience can hurt you in several ways:You’ll get impressions that won’t result in clicks, which will lower your CTR (Click-Through Rate)—a key metric for Google.You might actually get a click from a curious person who just wants to check it out.

If you have questions about lowering your taxes with real estate and would rather have someone else handle your yearly returns, give us a call or shoot me a DM, and we can get started. 

My buybox is <150k, as turnkey as possible, 3 bed, prefer 2 bath but will do 1 bath for the right deal, neighborhoods with lower crimes than the nearby areas, rent at <1.5k.

It’s a familiar debate, as Californians have faced this choice twice since 2018.Under the 2019 Tenant Protection Act, rent hikes have been capped at 10% per year or lower if inflation rates dictate.