Touching on what everyone else has mentioned, it can be illegal.

it appears you are out of luck, as the other post mentioned - where is your agent (or attorney) in all of this?

While completing a Cost Seg study, they were very resistent to me using 6% and because of time-sensitivity, I decided to default to the "rule of thumb" method that you mentioned and used 80/20. 

After talking with planning they mentioned that utilities were 2 miles (10,000+) ft away.

Hello @Roberto Rohann,Some lenders do not run municipal searches so some of issues mentioned wouldn't affect your ability to obtain a loan for the property. 

If they didn't respond kindly to sincere attempts to fix the problem, I'd mention your attempts.

Every asset you mention, you have a side reason why it won't work.

It is illegal to discriminate against a tenant based on their source of income so I would advise against even mentioning this in any way shape or form.Are you qualified to purchase expensive RE?

It does have a new roof.Zillo shows it at $474 K and they mentioned asking $420. 

@Sanjeev Advani While this may be a good talking point what no one is mentioning is that with most of the federal land areas there is NOTHING there to draw people to want to live there.