Now if you could prove they were purposely steering qualified candidates to other units, or failing to market the unit at all, those would possibly be acts of fraud or gross negligence, which can be litigated. 

You're immature reply works against your message of trying to promote the program.

I second this, if asking for the identification is for the sole purpose of verifying one’s identity then it’s not a violation of the fair housing act, however, if it were to verify someone’s citizenship or something that is not required in order to meet the housing requirements then it could be determined as housing discrimination .Quote from @Steve K.: Quote from @David Spurlock: Hey @Fareen E.

If you're just starting out every dollar needs a purpose.

With those costs a new build with the purpose of selling is likely not worth it. 

And having the press and the government promoting forbearance like its a constitutional right really throws a wrench into the works.

Getting right to the purpose of my post, with all the relevant context: I’m 52 and living near Seattle.

The $200k financing would serve as a purpose to be a downpayment, or do you want the $200k to be the top limit of the investment?

Regarding a 1031 exchange, while the property was rented and treated as an investment property during your deployment, if you maintained it as your primary residence for tax purposes, it may complicate eligibility.

Or you can create the policy donate it and should be able to get 2.5 times the value for tax purposes.