Hey @Charlotte ChewI went through several interviews with different property management companies and ultimately have been extremely please with the group I am using now in San Antonio for my properties. 

I am using it to manage finances for my long term rentals, midterm and one short term rental so it's very compatible with most portfolios.

Florida video voyeurism law:810.145 Video voyeurism(1) As used in this section, the term:(c) “Place and time when a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means a place and time when a reasonable person would believe that he or she could fully disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that the person’s undressing was being viewed, recorded, or broadcasted by another, including, but not limited to, the interior of a residential dwelling, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth.(2) A person commits the offense of video voyeurism if that person:(a) For his or her own amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing another person, intentionally uses or installs an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, who is dressing, undressing, or privately exposing the body, at a place and time when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy;(b) For the amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit of another, or on behalf of another, intentionally permits the use or installation of an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, who is dressing, undressing, or privately exposing the body, at a place and time when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; or(c) For the amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit of oneself or another, or on behalf of oneself or another, intentionally uses an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record under or through the clothing being worn by another person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that person.(5) This section does not apply to any:(a) Law enforcement agency conducting surveillance for a law enforcement purpose;(b) Security system when a written notice is conspicuously posted on the premises stating that a video surveillance system has been installed for the purpose of security for the premises;(c) Video surveillance device that is installed in such a manner that the presence of the device is clearly and immediately obvious; It sounds like the OP's situation may not be covered.

And again this is where you have to go back to the intent of the legislation, it wasn’t to have more double closing’s, it was to stop shady individuals from stealing equity from old people, and agian just because you can maybe find a loophole in the law doesn’t mean a judge or jury is gonna interpret that way.The terms I am using are totally irrelevant to the law? 

I am using a hard money lender

I am using a FHA loan on my primary residence and don't want to refinance because we have a great interests rate. 

I am using a hard money lender and just purchased a property from auction in Hull, MA.

It's a scarcity play, I am a bit amused when I hear people still fight this argument.

I am using A.CRE retail underwriting tool.

I am using a CPA to do my taxes.