We have refused to insure properties because of the fat that there was a double closing and there was no disclosure made

I think it is more important to "trim the fat" from the budget, rather than the always popular political method of charging the taxpayers more in some fashion or another.

I'm just an old fat guy who is losing his hair, but I save money for my clients.

Then cut out the fat and create more time.  

There's a whole undercurrent of investors on BP that seem to believe that real estate agents do nothing more than open doors and collect big, fat checks. 

However, when I ran the numbers via the BP rental calculator, the cash flow result  was a big fat zero!

So by having to run specials all the time you get almost nothing but they get a fat check.

Always Remeber: Pigs get fat, Hogs get slaughtered

Not set up for utilities" and then pulling power from another property is a big fat fine for everyone involved.

Originally posted by Charles Perkins:I was just reading that HUD may expand the 203K program to investors.http://themortgagereports.com/10692/fha-203k-eligibility-may-soon-expand-to-real-estate-investorsI suspect that those loans will be fat with fees to replenish the insurance fund.