We read them, and interpret them.

Also, the letter of the law is always going to be up to interpretation by a judge in that local area.

Technically, the IRS guidance is not legally binding and the court disagreed with the IRS interpretation of the rule.

There is probably nothing wrong with the truth - wanting to buy a second home - but make sure it is not interpreted as getting a VA loan on a home that you don't plan on living in.

Kristine Marie Poe interpreted it correctly: once a judgment has been rendered in CT, the property belongs to the bank.

@Ken Durden Never rely on a tenant's interpretation of the meaning of something that is on their legal record.

I've done these before and with each bank its different it all depends on interpretation of the guidelines.

how many of the various issues they cover in there are quite open to interpretation, which to me means just more money for the lawyers!

My thinking is yes but then again legal wording is always open to interpretation.

I have searched the forum and the net looking for an authoritative source on interpretations and applications of the EPA RRP Rule.If anyone is able to refer me to an authority source I would appreciate it.