Bottomline is that you are unlikely to "win" a suit against the city and even if you did, the legal costs would be very high.

@Joe Freehold due to legal issues, not aware of anyone offering this anymore.

I see many times the deals get sent to the attorneys to "handle it" but this should be sorted out upfront whether tenant stays or goes.In terms of having the tenant removed, there is no way to have them removed from the legal perspective if they are paying rent and you weren't going to move into the unit.

I noticed one property where it seems that someone got a single mortgage with a legal description containing several properties.

This sounds like a legal scam to scare you out of your money.

You most certainly dont have a legal right to try to charge them a 6 month penalty.

The Sponsor needing 5 mil for project in addition to the common equity raise, will be in a preferred equity position ahead of common equity and of course behind the Lender with apparently no legal recourse to foreclose property.

Also, most of them have already had the special assessments  And yet not a month has gone by without a story in the news of that happening again because of the new Fannie Mae condo underwriting guidelines and the new Florida state law on condo reserves.

There was a guy on BP who tried to get one going down by Colorado Springs awhile ago called Bonsai Village and got as far as buying the land, but could never get permission due to NIMBY neighbors  and it got stalled in legal red tape until the  land eventually ended up being foreclosed on and turned into open space.

However, navigating the legal and financial complexities of Subto deals requires careful attention, so I’d recommend working with a real estate attorney to ensure everything is structured correctly.Securing private money for the closing is a smart move, but ensure your terms allow for flexibility in case of unexpected repairs or delays in cash flow.