
25 March 2014 | 3 replies
You'll need separate Errors & Omissions coverage.Workers Comp - which is much more possible if you don't make ABSOLUTELY sure that everybody doing work on your house is covered.Wrongful Acts - which broadly means causing harm intentionally and/or unlawfully(WC exclusions may be different in some states, but it will definitely be excluded here in WA.)Congrats on the new rental, and good luck!

6 April 2014 | 7 replies
As far as your case goes, if after your inspection you still think its worth buying, if you want to shoot them a lowball offer, I don't see the harm in trying one, other than the time it would take, etc the worst they can do is say "NO"!

12 February 2015 | 31 replies
Fish and Wildlife Service (224 special agents)•The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration“The whole notion of police operations these days, that they’re dressed to kill, that they’re up against an enemy, is wrong.

13 April 2014 | 27 replies
The inspection clause seems like a clear walk away situation, so from the buyer's side it seems like no harm, no foul.

24 August 2016 | 11 replies
Saw this while trying to research how to get rid of cigarette smoke https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/ozone-generators-are-sold-air-cleaners#ozone-health anyone have thoughts on how harmful ozone generators really are?

13 March 2015 | 110 replies
That displays forethought and a concern for one's neighbor - not wanton disregard..Provided that your water gathering gutter subsequently directs water to avoid his roof - I have a hard time imagining that you are causing him any harm.

14 December 2014 | 39 replies
Maybe you were joking, but putting someone else's animal in harm's way over a property seems like that person shouldn't own animals.

7 May 2015 | 29 replies
I understand he is not in the best situation and you are trying to help him out, but I would never put myself in a situation that could have the chance to harm myself.

15 July 2014 | 21 replies
My concern is not that she wants to approve the deals, it's that with limited RE knowledge and her own agent she would do more harm than good in this partnership.