We still believe that interaction between people is essential on a discussion forum, and we know that if we allow company accounts to engage on the forum, it will certainly lead to spam. - Users are able to create more than one company.

Throw on top of that your involvement in the tenant selection process or actively engaged in rehabs by purchasing fixers that you make ready to rent.It is not necessary to manage your own properties, but it makes it easier especially when you only have 1 or 2 properties.Bottom line is it is a judgment call what level of activity constitutes "regularly involved."

They go through the trouble of typing up an incredibly long and engaging email, about how they can do this... if someone would just give them an opportunity.

Not so much in response rate, but in engaging with motivated sellers and getting deals done.

., but the truth is that by engaging more, I benefit more.

:welcome:You will certainly expand your network by joining the group here.Note that best way to do so is to engage in the discussions.

If you do engage in a prohibited transaction, and the IRS finds out, they will invalidate your entire IRA account, not just the prohibited transaction.

I spoke with two foreclosure/short sale experts at my meeting tonight, but didn't have time to engage in an in-depth conversation... so their advice was simply "Just get the deal on paper first -- get them to sign it over to you before doing anything else."

the challenge seems to be in finding an escrow/title company that will allow the "double escrow" to be done.....for example: there is an escrow open that is required by the lender once the "approval" from the lender is secured....then there needs to be another escrow opened between the "buyer" and the "end-buyer" on the same property....so, "end buyer" comes into escrow with the $300K plus closing costs, closes existing escrow on the property...then the title/escrow officer walks into the next room and applies the $250K plus closing costs to the original escrow to close that one.in theory and once in the past this was the way it was and still should be...but, now as it seems, most escrow/title companies are not wanting to do the "double" escrow for reasons of "full disclosure" to all parties, for fear of not being "sued" for some type of fraud.those of us not engaging in these tactics get penalized.....but, such is life....i have a title company that has stated they will do a "double" escrow but, will need to let the lender know this fact. not disclose the "amount" the "end-buyer" is paying, merely disclose there is a 'double" escrow in effect....well, obviously this should kill the deal right at the very end....so, not a wise direction to take....

Just my opinion....The lack of information on many of the posts and profiles of any forum can discourage others from engaging in any type of serious conversation.RE_Jokester_01 want's to know about a $100MM loan but doesn't provide his/her real name, an email, and at least a vague geographical location; how serious could they be?