I believe this is fairly standard across the board.

They could also call the local board of realtors and talk to the grievance or professional standards dept to file a complaint.

By adhering to our standard procedures, we’re able to maintain consistency and fairness across all tenants, avoiding any perception of favoritism.Thanks again for your feedback!

If you have facilities on-property, definitely have them use those.

It took new construction costs from $800-2500 down to $325 / SF and instead of 2 years it can be done in 8-12 months (design, permits, fabrication, shipping, and erection) depending on how much homeowners customized the standard plans. 

I suppose here is a good time to ask you all, the “more expert than me-s” in the thread: on a scale of “5% return standard deviation bond market” to “15% return standard deviation stock market”, where would you put the unleveraged, post expense rental income of a well managed (aye, there’s the rub) SFH portfolio?

If your going to pay 50% at least have her go over there and do some "deep cleaning" that may not be included in standard turnovers.

If it's a standard step down, you may take a big hit on points.

They were not terrible, some people would call them C minus, and it wasn't even that much about financial considerations at the time (appreciation was not a thing back then in Milwaukee) but just not what I wanted to own or manage, so I sold them to them tenants - after quite a bit of financial coaching to get them to qualify for a loan.My standard advice is always to buy the best quality property you can afford.

It seems like the standard worry is that your place could get trashed but lower-income renters, have you/those you know had good experiences?