Also, separate bank accounts from day one, get insurance (builder’s risk is a lifesaver), and don’t skimp on an attorney when setting up your partnership.

So thats the riskI was genuinely curious.

I work with a lot of househackers and they're typically on the 12 month cycle, rinse and repeat.While the proposition of acquiring an investment property outside of your market in a "landlord friendly" state may sound appealing, i would recommend you stay local for now and househack another couple of properties over the next few years until you've got some more time / experience under your belt.you would need a management company to cover your property that is outside of your market which would not only take 8-10% of your gross it would also leave you a bit vulnerable to a property management company that you A.)know nothing about and B.)you won't have the experience or cashflow or proximity to deal with any headaches that may arise.i would recommend staying local and househacking your way along for now and then maybe hire a local property management company initially to work with your current/local properties to get a taste of what to expect if and when you begin investing outside of your market.

Definitely something to clarify upfront...If you’re replacing with another restaurant, it should be an easier transition since the setup is already in place.Your biggest risk is vacancy $450K/year is solid, but if you ever need a new tenant,  ensuring the lease rate is sustainable is key! 

I just do all my bookings over airbnb, its too risky to go direct as the guests aren't covered by airbnb insurance.

@Paul Cijunelis  thank you for this response Paul, well I firstly got interested in CRE when one of my high school teachers told me about how he does it and that kind of started my interest, I really love CRE because I've noticed it's a very lucrative and risky business like high risk high reward, but not just that I really love seeing a bunch of properties being brought back to life with renovations.

In my opinion a fully passive RE investment is the most risky because you give total control to others. 

(you’re going to spend too much on these and it’s risky.)b.  

-save $1k+ in taxes and fees yearly-can use the savings to get more insurance and a higher liability than the value of house. for flipping houses in California does anyone just put into sole proprietor own name and just use the $1k+ in savings for LLC costs into Insurance or use for savingor am I just being too risky. 

House hacking locally is typically going to be the least risky way to get started, even if it is more expensive of a property.