This will get you the name on the dog on record designating that specific animal as their ESA.Good idea -- AND ask for additional rent/deposit, unless there is some legislation forbidding it for a properly registered service animal.My humble opinion, all this "emotional support" stuff is simply BS so they can take their precious animals everywhere they go and not have pay extra.

There is legislation pending that would allow it to be done without a City Council Ordinance, but it's unclear if this legislation will pass. 

Legislators often leverage future obligations in the form of bonds.

Whether it’s understanding the new legislation or tackling the day-to-day management of your property, it’s worth having a conversation to see what might work best for you.

I think the problem is this...Legislation and government is making it too difficult to be a landlord.

True, Republicans in 2025 will control the White House and both chambers of Congress.You can easily Google how the legislative process works or just trust my Cliff Note: having a simple majority usually does NOT assure that Congress passes any bill, including tax bills.

I for one want to buy a property and STR it in Asheville, but I think this legislation nixes that idea.

While I believe that breed-specific legislation is wrong, I also believe that, if you own a controversial breed, then you need to be an extra-responsible owner.  

The verbiage on the contract, concealing your NET, being able to truly purchase with cash..... but most importantly, I am a firm believer that more legislation will come in (Oklahoma, Illinois, NJ) are examples - and assignments will one day be banned, especially for those non-licensed. 

Also, I am hearing that recent legislation has affected buyers agent commissions.