
4 June 2017 | 6 replies
You'll also have the make the distinction of it's for you (or a tenant) and who is paying the utility bills.

12 August 2017 | 4 replies
Might consider a title holding land trust too... thus, alleviating the concern for the due on sale clause...although it can be paperwork intensive.Anyways, I encourage you to address the taxes and insurance distinctly in your contract, no matter which tool of seller finance you use.

17 August 2017 | 5 replies
@Drew Kimminau that is accurate and clear distinction.

2 August 2017 | 33 replies
A subtle distinction?

1 August 2017 | 18 replies
Read up on these two distinct schools of thought and make your decision based on that.

2 August 2017 | 16 replies
Again great points and I am glad we made the distinction.

5 August 2017 | 12 replies
It's a fine distinction and, under the law, the courts are erring on the side of the sellers and agents/brokers.For maximum safety, plan on doing back-to-back closings.

10 May 2017 | 11 replies
Four distinct legal entities (2 LLCs and 2 SDIRAs) with no disqualified persons involved, no common partnership in the LLCs, and no money from the loans being directly or indirectly returned to the owner of the SDIRA / LLC.Thanks,Richard

8 May 2017 | 5 replies
Cash out refi, heloc, etc.Answer: There are two distinctly different camps on this question; one camp says never encumber your personal residence unless you have to and the other Rich Dad Poor Dad version says mortgage it to the hilt.

18 May 2017 | 10 replies
The other surprise is that I distinctly remember being taught that MA is NOT a "buyer beware" state when I took my pre-licensing course in real estate.Looking into it, a couple of trusted real estate blogs say that it is.