It might not be a house, but it's a home for your money, dreams and family even if indirectly. 

You just need to decide for yourself about how much value their tax advise will give you, if it will save you money in taxes and will give you a peace of mind.The bookkeeping fees, on the other hand, seem very competitive to me.In general, I think that real estate investors should not forget about indirect expenses associated with having a business.

I assume there is some prerequisite to a sub or supplier (a party not in direct contract with the owner) before they can file a lien.  

@Chad FriesenApologies for the delay in following-on, it's been a tumultuous week.If you are purchasing residential (1 - 4 unit) properties on your own, or even with your spouse, holding the properties indirectly within a corporation or directly in your own name will have little bearing on the number of properties you can purchase using conventional financing.  

It's a metric commonly referenced, but only indirectly influences valuation.

@Dale RanftAn ex-spouse is not a disqualified party to an IRA.One needs to be careful, however, that there is no indirect benefit to a disqualified person, such as a child of the ex-wife still living in your household.

What you are describing  would be a self-dealing prohibited transaction that would void the IRA.There can be no direct or indirect transactions between an IRA and a disqualified party. 

It means if you can put 20% down, they'll, indirectly, loan you the rest of the purchase price.

I can understand it if it was a sales brochure, or if was a promotional material, that was indirectly a sales piece.

If the purchaser acts in such a manner so as to participate in distribution of the securities to the public, either directly or indirectly as a link between the issuer and the public, he or she will be deemed to be an underwriter and the selling broker-dealer and other participants in the distribution, including the issuer, will be in violation of Section 5 of the 1933 Act.