As @Brandon Turner said the pod casts are great for learning the fundamentals.  

Because more information about market fundamentals and conditions is now available from such sources as Real Capital Analytics (RCA) and NIC MAP, the availability of information has increased investor understanding of the sector.

Many of these fundamentals jive with frequent BP topics:-Make your money work for you; not the other way around-Diversify income streams and assets-Learn to play the tax game and measure what you keep; not what you makeWhere I think BP tends to stray a bit is on topics like these:-Focus-Patient money-Raise moneyI constantly see threads and hear discussions from people that measure vanity metrics like number of doors held.  

It's up to you as an investor to decide which it is.Price run-ups, even rapid ones, are not automatic indicators of a 'bubble' per se, though this definition seems to be trending over the last few years, rather a bubble is significant price appreciation without the fundamental substance to support it.

I'm saying there is a method to the madness and there are fundamental strategies to minimize the risk and they happen BEFORE you buy. 

The fundamental problem is you are selling something you do not own.  

You should vote against this because it is fundamentally unfair.

Study the fundamental of real estate.

KC has good economic and demographic fundamentals.

If I take a 30 year loan and make the 15 year loan payment, my loan would be paid off at exactly 15 years.In actuality, the 15 year interest rate is pretty much always lower so the 30 year will always take longer to pay off, even if you make the 15 year payment because you'll be paying at a higher rate.The only way you could pay off the 30 year payment in 12 years is by making a much higher payment than the 15 year P&I or by getting a lower interest rate on the 30 year than the 15 year (which isn't impossible but exceedingly unlikely.I'm not sure where you heard this from, but it is fundamentally wrong.