The moratorium states that not only can you not evict, but can not serve notice of evictions or lease terminations UNLESS it meets the high bar qualification for illegal activity at property as listed in state statute (basically they must be caught for running ti as a crack house) or tenants are putting other tenants in immediate danger of harm (think domestic issues case, and have to have proof such as police reports) or significant damage to property (state attorney general put this bar so high that it's things like concrete down drains or stripping home, over the top extreme things). 

Because of all that experience I can keep you out of harm's way.

Fear is actually a natural element that helps to keep us from harming ourselves.

Please, explain to me how someone is harmed in this scenario or, you would have to admit, it is completely irrational to make it illegal.

Until those cause harm, nothing is really done.

If you are going to keep it, no harm, but I always adivse staying with a marketable property.

Luckily, no one was harmed/injured.

BTW, a first position could redeem a second position if the action would harm the first's position.

-fixing up the property little by little to build up "pride of tenant ownership": if the property is updated and taken care of, tenants will be more reluctant to destroy/harm it.I was also thinking of installing a ANIMAL WASTE STATION with a sign, trash basket and plastic bags, however it's 300$, and we will not need it within a year.

because 'the house harmed me' - regardless of 'fault'?