but not unreasonable. 

What are everyone's thoughts on "Unreasonable" Goals?

Now, I know that desire does not equal value and there is also no market value for sentimental attachment, but in working with a realtor before, I did not think that to be an unreasonable goal.

I should be entitled to this and I don't think it is unreasonable. 

Will the bid be fixed to include any changes/repairs required by the inspector (even if the inspector is being unreasonable)? 

We do them consistently and I can help you get them.Under 100K is not unreasonable dispite what others are saying.

Especially if it's saving the partnership a lot on interest, I don't think it's unreasonable for him to accrue some portion of that benefit for bringing it to the table. b) If the guarantor/broker I not bringing a lot of personal financial strength and you could get the construction loan anyway with a low LTV, then MUCH LESS.

It was a foreclosure I remodeled, all-in Cap Rate of 9 while it appraised at $142k which is right under a 7 cap, so an appraisal of $190k isn't unreasonable.

If a corporation is involved like this in some development and offer twice + what you paid, I'd sell it and rely on the financial loss arising from the unforeseen unsolicited opportunity as causing a financial hardship and unreasonable loss, stressing that the intent was to live there.

Its not about them being 'unreasonable' its about the asset managers and every other person on the REO team having to follow strict guidelines that are dictated by company policy and procedure.