Am I interpreting it correct?

Abbot is saying this will make Texas cities like Austin less safe.Mayor Adler says only 21mil has been cut so far, but much more will be "reallocated" (80mil + 49mil). 80 mil to 911 call centers, forensics labs, administrative services, and internal affairs. 49 mil to eliminate "entire police units like patrol and traffic enforcement for other public safety options" Of course, politicians always frame things in a way that suits their agenda, so not sure what to interpret from all of it.

The SEC recently changed the interpretation of an accredited investor too to allow for certain FINRA-based tests to be taken as a proxy for accreditation so the investors could take and pass those as well to be accredited.  

Any legal interpretations out there?

From what I read it should but I’m curious as to how courts will interpret this.  

I've had guys (especially when they're looking at 4+ places) give me heartburn when they insist on using their 30-year friend that is a residential mort guy.Do NOT interpret this as a slam on res mort brokers - It's just a diff business from comm mortgage.

Even going to your states actually bylaws and trying to interpret that, (even though it sounds like a foreign language to me)!

I interpret that as the cost of materials going up is not my problem.

This requires a crystal ball that no one has - first, to believe that your assumptions will come true, and there are plenty of people that would call hogwash on that - and second, to interpret the response of the irrational animal called man.

As every County and Sheriffs office seem to have their own ways of interpreting the eviction moratoriums, try and secure a courtesy chat with an eviction expert to find out how difficult or easy it is to evict a person occupying a foreclosed property.