data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e855/0e855be99936ead1fc445a22a61869866f563585" alt=""
18 February 2023 | 15 replies
The property is the asset securing their loan.But say for instance someone quit paying when there was $100,000 left owing on a $500,000 loan and the house is worth $750,000 now (just to create a set of conditions to illustrate different outcomes.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8848/e88487e8604dbc1cf1a874ba492a49ecb16e68c4" alt=""
4 May 2020 | 4 replies
Many of the duties of a tenant may extend to occupants of the properties, but it'll cost you a lot of money (i.e. your attorney's time) to illustrate that to a judge, and even then it's a risky bet.Minors are occupants, adults aren't (except for the cases that @Nathan alluded to).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da7f2/da7f2875a87412e0b8d9b780ec6965c38dd16b44" alt=""
16 May 2023 | 12 replies
I guess in 2018 the picture is slightly different :)One other way of illustrating this is create comparison chart based on ZHI.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8814/c88147cac3bc2ff8f5f8995f92d8f0d51d3de7a3" alt=""
8 August 2023 | 5 replies
If they will do a loan with less than 1, the pricing takes a hit.I've included an example below to help illustrate this.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70eac/70eac8403f91d48488e27c5ab45568cca627a3b1" alt=""
6 December 2014 | 13 replies
At a higher level, all agents and brokers have responsibilities to the seller, but a buyer's agent's first duty is to their client, the buyer.To illustrate this, consider deposit money on a contract.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7001f/7001f3d36d60441670e3046375d6b223de60c493" alt=""
19 September 2023 | 1 reply
The operator has an uphill battle to win though since rental arbitrage has a negative reputation, partly due to all the bad operators out there trying to make a quick buck.Now I have a horror story to share that illustrates the down side, maybe the worst case scenario, with doing rental arbitrage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cf8d/9cf8ddb4cb264d534220becc7232f36cb520a439" alt=""
20 September 2023 | 5 replies
So 1250 rent for a 1000 mortgage payment to illustrate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8399c/8399c4ec009ed9704d1cb0af0f850c9c337c5d75" alt=""
9 August 2023 | 9 replies
Yes, you are correct.Sorry, I just meant to illustrate that the costs of your audit protection at a later point would be doubled or atleast much more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/210d6/210d6af9c96a95db748d57be4321cd689039c506" alt=""
14 June 2020 | 28 replies
Let me illustrate an example using a property that costs $100,000 rent would be $1000 per month using the 1%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54c5a/54c5a209b51b981865b7ec0713d47b1c1cd3709d" alt=""
7 April 2021 | 9 replies
Coincidently, I just came across this decision in Indiana entered yesterday, I think it illustrates my point nicely.HUGHES v.