
27 January 2012 | 15 replies
Second, I would look at the Federal Reserve very closely.

26 January 2012 | 21 replies
It has held value better than almost any area of the country, due primarily to federal govt bloat.
30 January 2012 | 7 replies
Both these businesses are non-real estate businesses.So here's my advice:My advice is to talk to an attorney AND a CPA, because your decision intersects state and federal tax laws.

13 February 2012 | 18 replies
If you bought an REO property (to be used as a rental) that needed substantial repairs and the market value is higher than what you paid for it, how do you determine the basis for federal taxes?

14 February 2012 | 8 replies
He also includes links to government (county/state/federal) sites that pertain to the area that he identified.At $400, he's a little more expensive than some of the others around here, but I'm very happy with the reports and he has been able to give me advice that I know has saved me thousands.

21 February 2012 | 13 replies
I do recommend you talk to a legal and tax professional before acting.Taxes (This is a Federal Designation):Sole Proprietorships, S-Corps, Partnerships, and the default tax status of LLCs are all pass through tax entities.

10 April 2013 | 22 replies
My current position with the Federal Government in Afghanistan won't allow me to do a strategic bankruptcy as they monitor my creditworthiness in relationship to the security clearance I hold.

16 February 2012 | 6 replies
McKellar Newsom If the person is Canadian here are some banks:Harris bank (bank of montreal) will deal with loans 50% of purchase price but they will want to have a relationship with the buyer firstRBC Centura (RBC canada) not as picky to having a pre-existing relationship with clients and will do up to 70% of loan to valueWashington Federal- minimum investment $50,000 to $700,000 up to %65 of Loan to ValueTD Canada trust-not sure the details but I know some investors have used them.

21 February 2012 | 21 replies
At a minimum, you might want to spread the w/d's out over more than one tax year, for example to keep the marginal federal tax impact at the 15% versus 25% tax rate.

29 September 2019 | 15 replies
And probably in violation of federal law already!