I see a few challenges arising with this type of set-up.If for example, he/she doesn't do a good job or if you no longer need their services or if a conflict arises between landlord and manger.Is their a way to structure the managers pay without bumping in to challenges later on?

I'm reviewing my rental property insurance after having gone through issues with the first ever claim on my current policy, which we're finding out has poor claims service and lacks ordinance or law coverage.

I have never needed a lead service.

My guess is the 10% mark up because that's far less than any reputable GC will charge for their services. 

That being said, you cannot ban all animals, because you cannot ban service animals from the property.

If you're a 5% owner for only part of the tax year, then only the services performed during that period count toward qualifying.Also, it's important to note that the Tax Court has held that merely being on calls doesn't meet the 750-hour requirement.

In case it's helpful, here are the companies around the twin cities which I've had the best experiences with subbing out different projects at my properties:For any electric work, I've had good luck with Stafford Home Services. 

I have an opportunity to raise capital with a private individual at a flat interest-only rate as a way to reduce interest charges and eliminate origination and service fees.

What does paying them 10% for their services have to do with this?

When you choice who is going to service your loan what are you looking for?