I try to have competitive advantages that aren't easily destroyed.

Some of those areas are beat up and destroyed with boards ups and the like, other areas still really nice there, and there is also some redevelopment over there.  

In this case, even if you do decide that restoring is the best bet, then building onto something that has been destroyed might not join 100% perfect.

If you don't know what they are doing exactly, they may destroy your property.

All documents have been destroyed in this case with only those imaged remaining.

Yes if I only get $850 a month I still will make money, "assuming they don't destroy stuff which Im sure they will" school district are best in the state and neighborhood is very very good.She does work and make $1800 a month but from what the HUD representative told me is that shes on a special program "like section 8" to improve her lifestyle.

No, that seems like it would destroy and architectural feature and cost you money.

It destroyed the axle.

It basically has had water damage for many years that will ultimately destroy the building. 

Including tenants who destroy homes, property managers who are dishonest and rip you off for maintenance, extended vacancies, no capital growth, terrible insurance, the list goes on.