If you can and are willing to use bank debt, there's no harm in doing it.

They already caused the harm by losing the 1st deal.

This kind of indecision is harmful when running a business.

Think, the USDA brining armed feds to shut down Amish farmers for selling their unpasteurized milk, or the FDA allowing harmful chemical additives in our food that are banned in hundreds of other countries.

At a minimum you can have the satisfaction of knowing that the collection action will sit on their credit report for many years to come and may prevent them from harming another landlord.

You won't be upset if they don't feel like they aren't a good fit together"  No harm done and it just sets the expectations for you both and you know you did everything you could to get your point across.  

This action caused the property owner financial Harm.  

the reality is in situations like this when there Is massive litigation going on.. the very last thing your lawyer would have you do is get on Social media in any form.. its hunker down time for him.. full defense mode.. for those harmed its cry it to the ceilings to warn others.. with that much litigation something is going on its not just drama etc.. lawyers cant just file complaints without basis that's against the rules. 

If you trust in this property, the inspection comes back all clean and its truly something you want then there is no harm.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.