data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd2ac/bd2ace5ba0dcbcc23d6ddec5dd5f0851504c1082" alt=""
5 August 2007 | 5 replies
I told him I will work with him on a pure option deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a9d5/1a9d59cfba9c59f43099607dc99e9515dfba6199" alt=""
9 February 2006 | 5 replies
However, if you pay less for the new property then you can be liable for the difference.I have never stepped down in a 1031 exchange so this is purely conjecture... but I would guess that your tax liability would be something like this: $Sale price of your current home- $Sale price of home you buy through 1031--------------------------------------------------- $Boot $Boot- $500K------------------ $Taxable gain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c77f3/c77f331ceeabf4dd3faf53da1c1574b749af9248" alt=""
7 April 2007 | 3 replies
I don't think pre-approval letters are "worthless" but they are if you take them at pure face value without talking to the loan officer directly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d0df/5d0df640eee39dd3c8f5e3f1b06584b344049dec" alt=""
23 April 2007 | 18 replies
Instead of trying to put a number on something that I can't possibly know and that is purely random, if I use the 45% to 50% total expense number that has proven true over hundreds of thousands of rental units, I will be MUCH MORE ACCURATE.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6823a/6823a80ea325a69a53c5978fb46765589832945b" alt=""
11 May 2007 | 2 replies
If you are able to get a 30yr fixed @ 7 percent and roll all of your improvements into the loan, you are looking at around 300 a month extra, but thats not pure cash flow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/930cf/930cfe9ae86674f46573c07a3b422fba234ff7e6" alt=""
19 May 2007 | 7 replies
I also like the idea of providing SOLUTIONS to people's problems instead of just looking at it as a pure money-making thing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b93/33b9304bdcf29231abd439695657891e31e272c2" alt=""
27 June 2007 | 16 replies
Probably can't be measured in pure $$ but will make living there more enjoyable.Adding a bath is IMO (and statistically proven) a moneymaker, particularly if you can do most/all work yourself, partiuclarly the "finish" like tiling, because it's very labor intensive.IIRC single bath houses have been considered "technologically" obsolete since the early '80 by the Amer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b716b/b716bd5a5d5c9a1b73630c310d7920eb6d0c0def" alt=""
10 July 2007 | 31 replies
The financial data used to determine the market cap is pure fiction; the resulting market cap is therefore nonsense; and the majority of residential units in the United States are owned by small investors - the majority of whom fail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b91d/9b91dbd4a8c70b88ac96c66d982361540b3b2fae" alt=""
30 July 2007 | 8 replies
If you carry a 30-year note at 10% (just as an example) with a $2K down payment on the same property it'll take you 9.5 years to recover your full $25K (the payments are almost exactly $200) but then the 20 years after that are pure profit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d23c/7d23cb52c9541ed8118a25b6e3dec87b1aeec597" alt=""
8 May 2009 | 10 replies
But, not pure appreciation.I do recommend checking with the lender.