For the standard single asset syndication the timelines just don't work).But beyond that:Most institutions want to see 15 yrs of track record before investingMost institutions will require 10% co-invest, and given the check sizes institutions write, many syndicators don't have that kind of liquidity available.Most institutions will require a true corporate structure.  

Keep in mind that the US Presidential election is on November 5.July 31: 9% (down from 10% two weeks ago)Sept 18: 93% (up from 62% two weeks ago)Nov 7: 97% (up from 75% two weeks ago)Dec 18: 99% (was 93% two weeks ago)They Said It“Buyers are balking at 7% mortgage rates and record home prices (in many markets).

Developing a track record of successful investments and leveraging your track record by syndications or creating an investment fund4.

That code section states:(1) “Prospective owner-occupant” means a natural person who presents to the trustee an affidavit or declaration, pursuant to Section 2015.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that:(A) They will occupy the property as their primary residence within 60 days of the trustee's deed being recorded.

You could point out to your husband that unless you have a record he isn't going to remember the slow drain request was the last 3 times and now maybe you need a plumber.

They have a great track record and seem to do well there but I may want to try a B class at some point.  

The fact is I found out (details at this link) that many more SDIRA beneficiaries are buying property with SDIRA funds rather than lending, according to public records.

there is a judgement my name would be on record - for a longtime - even though this was a business dealing and not a personal deal.In my case, I own my properties in my name and self-manage my properties with a Single member LLC.,  and I am thinking of using the LLC name as the "Landlord".

Credit Union #2: I think the only reason to really consider this one (I don't think the slightly lower points makes that much of a difference) is if the above two options both passed on the deal, a possible reason for that would be (ahem, guess why I am saying what I'm about to say...) an inexperienced management team trying to justify this refinance based on only 6 months of financials (rather than say a 1-2+ year track record of success, or experience with other facilities, etc).

They had a track record of completing work, multiple crews, standard materials, and refinancing successfully.