As a wholesaler,  I aim to develop relationships to benefit BOTH investors and sellers through ethical and transparent communication.

I am not sure how how being licensed corrects ethics though.

When used as a substitute for "Subject to", it circumvents "Due on Sale" because the title doesn't "change hands" right away.Seems a bizarre way to sell your home unless you need to do a "subject to" or you have little or no equity and can't raise your share of the closing costs as the seller.The agent may be a "wanna be" REI without enough education or ethics to make a go of it at this point.I'd find another agent...David J Dachtera"Success is not a destination.

@Alex Rogers  Code of ethics has zero to do with this... nothing in the Code of ethics says you MUST represent a client if you choose not to... once in the transaction sure.. but not before...

A bunch of little kings ruling their little kingdom with no spines, no ethics, no reason.

What we get as a response from newbie wholesalers is typical, denial, I'm not breaking any law, I'm ethical, I'm honest, etc.Seems too, they always feel like they own a thread if they start one, as if this isn't a public forum, demonstrates that sense of entitlement that youngsters suffer from.Another one bites the dust

Where is the ethics in that?

These are professionals with additional training and a stricter code of ethics.

Is it legal and ethical, do they understand the deal and are they happy, do you understand the deal and are you happy?  

These are members that adhere to a higher code of ethics and are generally more professional.Read their reviews on Google or Facebook.