Perhaps a simple nightly rental cost multiplied by a conservative number of nights rented/month?

Then depending on location, they may use CAP Rate or a Gross Rent Multiplier to come up w/ a value.

When comparing the size of comps, You should be fine with a 10% variation either way.However, if you wanted to be 100% safe, you could calculate cost-per-sf (divide the sale price of the comp by the sq ft) and then multiply this ratio by the sf of the subject home to get a size-adjusted comparable value.In your example, if the comp sold for $50K, cost-per-sf would be $67.29/sf, making the size-adjusted comp value $45,760.

Returns are multiplied when your capital is leveraged, but so is your risk.If you are risk adverse, then I would suggest going the cash route.

That's one of the things that makes a house-hack such an investment multiplier: it requires little capital.Go out there and get it, Cesar!

As mentioned, we have an 88% retention rate on our portfolio as of this past leasing season (industry average is ~50% retention), so you could make some sort of guess at how the tenants will act and then multiply half a month’s rent (or $250 min) for each flip done for the leasing fee as an additional cost

A yield on this single component can exceed average stock or bond dividend yields.LeverageLeverage is the great investment return multiplier.

I multiplied 361,000 by 0.04 then I multiplied that by 5 what should I have done?

Ive also seen up to around 12% at one firm using a form of a multiplier, I will go find the technical verbiage and tell you.

-typically Tenants pay for utilities and -ill add that in, right now tenant is under contract until mid 2021-house is older inside looks ok from pictures still need to actually see it in person. i probably should adjust the maintenance higher -property tax was estimated base on current tax assessment with multiplier being fairly close to what the sale price is now. the house was sold in 2018 for 80K