We invested cash and took on traditional investor loans.I uncovered that there was a bit of cash out financing going on to free up money for more houses.... essentially pulling out all the created appreciation profit, and leveraging it to buy more new homes.

I found that logic to be deeply flawed in most cases and it should be taken with a grain of salt.  

To which I spend hours at a time combing through the nitty gritty of homes until I uncover perfectly matched criteria "winners".

It's unfortunate that a buyer would have no other remedy apart from legal action in the above situation, but I agree it's unrealistic to expect inspectors or agents to perform heavy lifting / moving of furniture to uncover every last defect.

We looked for ones that had been returned or had minor damage because they heavily discount lumber when it has a flaw.

I'm great a networking and being creative when it comes to deals but I try and attract partners that compliment my flaws.

I often get multiple quotes and show other people the plans to see if they can find any flaws in it.When you start tackling issues with using an LLC you will find some banks wont want to lend to a new LLC, and of those banks who do you will often have a higher rate to pay.

Sure it might be useful but he/she is not going to reveal any real goodies anyway; you need to uncover everything, the  good and bad, about the building and the finances for yourself.

In this case, I feel that if I am the one coordinating the repairs and fronting the capital to do so, as well as assuming risk of things not uncovered by a standard home inspection that may arise, then the price should be a fair bit lower.

This isn't a flaw. you misunderstand the method.