This is what's attracting me to the idea of targeting condos rather than SFR's, although as a newbie I'm looking to understand what's likely wrong with my interpretation of this.

Being nice to tenants just seems to be interpreted as weakness. 

Imagine how the law got interpreted in this case.

When I read your initial post/question I interpreted your question to be about filing/remitting the required (lodging/sales) taxes for your bookings (not the federal/state taxes you would file on annual returns).

Get some help interpreting what the return says before sending it. 

Again, I'm not an expert on Indiana law, but that's my interpretation of it after a quick read of your state's laws. 

I interpret this to mean I owe $100/mo. regardless of whether I use it or not and that's in addition to the $100 annual fee that is waived if I accumulate over 100 dollars in interest over the year. 

Now, of course military status being protected is intended to prevent discrimination against military-affiliated people, but just like race is a protected class to protect minority races from discrimination, yet you still can't give preference to any particular race, I would interpret that the same way for military status (can't give preference for or against) in a state that protects it for fair housing purposes.I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice - just based on my understanding of (Ohio) fair housing.

@Elizabeth Goff Sorry to hear about the claim.You are correct in your interpretation of your policy. 

While there is no black-and-white safe harbor rule for your circumstances, I have a feeling that we could interpret these Regulations in your favor.