Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Chicago Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,845
Posts
2,352
Votes
Henry Lazerow
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
2,352
Votes |
1,845
Posts

Vote against new tenant RLTO in Chicago

Henry Lazerow
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

I encourage everyone to respond to this call to action regarding the changes to the RLTO being proposed by the Mayor. This ordinance will impact landlords' ability to renovate their units as well as for new conversions/construction projects to continue within the city of Chicago. 

The proposal:

-Increases the tenant notification of lease termination to 90 days, up from 30 days.

-Mandates that even if the tenant is given proper notice, if a landlord renovates, converts to condominium or demolishes their property within 3 months of the tenant moving out, they will have to pay the tenant a $2500 relocation fee.

Cast your vote against here... https://www.votervoice.net/ILRealtors/Campaigns/74776/Respond

Thank you for your support.

    Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    40
    Posts
    33
    Votes
    Sarah Lewis
    • Investor
    • Chicago, IL
    33
    Votes |
    40
    Posts
    Sarah Lewis
    • Investor
    • Chicago, IL
    Replied

    I think if we want to make an effective case against this legislation, we need to think about unintended consequences that will end up hurting tenants. We already know people/politicians don't 'feel our pain'. 

    When I read the legislation, as written, it seems that it would be safer for landlords to NOT sign yearlong leases. 

    Seems like that will mean that tenants will have less, not more, security. 

    Remember when everyone took security deposits? Then the laws fining landlords for technicalities, like not keeping deposit in a separate account, or being 5 cents off on interest came to be. I don't know about your, but I have moved away  from security deposits altogether and no do a 'move in fee' of $300 or $400 dollars. Works out great for me! I get to keep the entire fee as opposed to returning the entire security deposit.

    Loading replies...