.”, it doesn’t sound good for STR’s....they’re not even saying the ban itself is unlawful.

You may want to look into trusts based on what you're describing.Either way, I think personal improvement and working on financial literacy and responsibility will elicit faster and longer lasting change in a person than an external force requiring saving and doling out punishment if the rules are violated.

I guess I am taking my punishment well!

Then, once the X days elapses, the landlord is eligible to file an unlawful detainer action (eviction) with the courts.  

I certainly do not want someone recommends unlawful strategies. 

I own the property and they are unlawfully occupying it, Yes ?   

It is difficult to believe that a court would award unlawful actions with quiet title based on an adverse possession theory.

This isn't a compromise, it punishes property owners at the expense of renters.Basically you took it up the butt, and they convinced you this was a "compromise".I'm going to go across every point of this and explain why it is very bad for landlords.- Landlords will be prohibited from raising rent more than 6% plus the “consumer price index” percentage for the West Region per year.

Let's think about the homeless man, outside of Paradise Valley Mall in Phx AZ who was chained to a metal bench and then lit on fire by teenagers.His death was truly tragic and the kids that did it deserve a special kind of punishment.

Its all just blank paperwork to them.Which is exactly why corporal punishment is likely the only solution.