You should look up Ian's group, The Real Estate Crowdfunding Review as they offer a fantastic network of like minded investors doing smart due diligence on projects across the spectrum of asset classes. 

This was Donald Bren's vision for developing Irvine Spectrum in the 1980s.

I once heard, its like asking advise on whats the best car.I am on the other side of the spectrum.

It has also been beneficial from a networking stand point as I have had the opportunity to develop relationships with other real estate professionals across the industry spectrum. 

The OP is, IMO, so far on the wrong side of the spectrum with this issue that I felt the most appropriate response was to illustrate the tenants likely point of view.And finally, there are plenty of people on this forum willing to give advice on how to be a more efficient slumlord all day long.

getting most lenders to get you in at 3.5%, you will be low in the spectrum when competing with other buyers.

If after checking that out and it's not covering a broader spectrum of REI, I've been toying with the idea of starting a group in Frederick, so let's talk Greg, perhaps we can get it going together?

You only have to be able to demonstrate adequately that your intent in buying the property was to hold for investment and something has caused you to change that intent.Think of it as a spectrum - If you buy it and move into it the same day it would be hard to prove that you purchased it to hold for investment. 

Yeah taken this into the legal spectrum is rather scary, but it maybe a necessary evil.

(Think downtown high-rise, and the most expensive apartments in your market).Class D properties on the other end of the spectrum are older than 30 years, have little to no amenities for tenants, higher vacancy rates and higher turn over, and likely have high foretasted maintenance cost due to neglect.