I personally want to try to calculate what they will walk away with so I can give my best offer up front (so I can waive my inspection contingency) and beat my competitors who just want it under contract so they can go nuts on the inspection. 

If I'm making $15-20k a month or own 100 properties when I'm 89, that doesn't give me time to enjoy the fruits of my labor.I finally decided that in 12 years, by the time I turn 40, I want to be retired from property management and focused primarily on managing my properties and finding new deals.

Agreed, Thanks for the fruitful advice @Tyon Pascal

Are you nuts?!

Do investors blame brokers/agents for going for the low hanging fruit??

(Living in an apartment with my sister who is going nuts because of dental school is no fun) I'm still in the research stages of the process and know I will most likely be purchasing a building where the owner wants out or is foreclosed on. 

I've recently bought clients a Roku 3 (for family of 4), a Roku stick for a 2nd home condo purchase, and a Keurig for a client who is a coffee nut and didn't have one already.

I love my architect in SF because he knows the nuts and bolts of pulling permits as much as he knows building codes and design.  

Comparing the two insurance types in this thread's title is like comparing an apple and a watermelon - yes, they both are fruits, but if your recipe for apple pie calls for apples, you don't substitute watermelon. 

The only real drawback I see is that they are heavy, you can't hang one by yourself, which can add to the cost of the door nut I do think the benefits out-weigh the cost.