If someone now claims they have under those circumstances, I'm sure they are lying or the judge was related to them or the seller had the dumbest attorney alive.So, wholesaling as it is taught by the gurus has 3 areas of concern, all can cause you a greater financial loss than what you might be trying to make.Now, does that mean wholesaling is dead or can't be done legally, without risks managed, in an ethical manner?

You can assist them in their research by telling them that the 1031 Exchange works in conjunction with Section 453 (Installment Sale Treatment).

You will be tempted, stay on course dealing ethically and legally the rewards are much greater.

The money now is so much easier to make and accumulate.Now own my own real estate auction company ----- isn't it great how a goal and a passion for something will materialize if you stick with it.Charles Thanks for sharing Charles you have a great work ethic.

But I would never put it in a C/S Corp for tax purposesYou could consider an S-Corp with partnership tax treatment.  

Judges across the nation recognize that is an unfair treatment of the buyer/borrower.  

Not to diminish their importance but aside from the legalities, ethics and complexities involved, if you have actually done subject to's, what are the overwhelming determining factors that would make a property a candidate for a subject to?  

Below slab treatment is critical, and so often done wrong.  

But, consider letting a tenant buy the place for you, since you have no real equity, paying down that loan is about the best thing you can do, ethically and legally. :) 

Would it be ethically wrong for me to have my own RE agent look into the property, help let me in, and help me make offers, etc. if I'm interested in rehabbing and reselling these houses?