Unfortunately, there aren't any places completely isolated from climate effects.

Remember the boy and girl conversion mostly accepted in California… but for something like AI the biggest front would be on the market where it is not regulated but tech savvy…USA is just too complex to adopt AI, the political powerhouse is still thinking in 1965 climate

@John Su tenants typically take care of snow when occupied, but owner is responsible when vacant - and some cities write tickets if snow not removed with x hours.In colder climates you also have to worry about keeping heat on when vacant so pipes don't freeze.

I don't know if today's climate of the city recognizing a need for more housing might make some sort of small difference (something you'd have to discuss with them) but, other than that, this is an accident waiting to happen.

When I ask for reasons I get cost of living, quality of live, moderate climate, fresh water access, no natural disasters and moving back to where they were from.From what I can see the trend to the Midwest is steadily increasing, but by no means as big as moving south.

I have a portfolio in Detroit (similar climate) and pay $75/mo for a SFH and ~$125/mo for my duplexes.

If it is temperate climate maybe it would be good to go without ceiling fans. 

(But it wasn't apples to apples.)I looked at AirDNA's data recently and don't disagree with their broad picture but again, people here know that the details and other factors can tell a different story and bring success for some in the same area (comparables) and loss for others.I'm all about reducing risk and my read on climate data and global economies (& yes, politics) incline me toward continued investment in properties that have multiple channels of revenue, above a certain latitude, and more upscale.

*Provide adequate climate control in order to keep moisture levels down and prevent mold growth by opening windows or using a dehumidifier if necessary.

Favorable destinations, and healthy tax and STR climates.